Tea Party of Scottsdale, AZ
Our mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize our fellow citizens to secure public policy consistent with our three core values: Personal Freedom, Economic Freedom and a Debt-Free Future


 

 

2015 bond pitch illustrates selective recession in Scottsdale

John WashingtonJohn Washington

If you have read the election information pamphlet for the upcoming Nov. 3 Scottsdale tax increase (aka, “bond”) election, virtually every argument published in favor of these new taxes refers to neglecting maintenance of Scottsdale’s taxpayer-owned infrastructure because of “hard decisions” and “the recession.”

Funny, I don’t recall any reference to “hard decisions” or “the recession” whenever the city council renewed the subsidy for Jason Rose’s annual polo match. Of course, Jason is the campaign PR manager for Scottsdale Mayor Jim Lane.

I don’t remember 

such references during council approval of $20 million in catch-up maintenance to bail out the PGA, which had neglected their contractual obligation to maintain the taxpayer-owned TPC course.

There wasn’t a single mention of hard times when Mayor Lane and the city council approved a million dollars of taxpayer-funded subsidies for Super Bowl parties last year.

Bond supporter Craig Jackson got millions of dollars of taxpayer-funded improvements at WestWorld tailored just for his Barrett-Jackson auto auction. No apparent recession or hard decisions there.

Tom Sadvery supports the bonds, because the recession was so bad that the city council sold a $4.5 million parcel of taxpayer-owned downtown Scottsdale land to Sadvery’s Scottsdale Healthcare (now “HonorHealth”) for $1.5 million, in a no-bid deal. And then upzoned it afterward to make it even more valuable so that Sadvery could borrow against it.

Most egregiously, the $4 million annual cash subsidy to the Scottsdale Cultural Council also appears to be “recession-proof.” Coincidentally, pro-bond former councilman Jim Bruner, and the wife of pro-bond city council member David Smith are among the trustees of the Cultural Council; which has a 20-year, no-bid city contract with no objective deliverables.

It’s quite curious to me that the recession seems to have only affected maintenance of fundamental city infrastructure, but not the rich and famous friends of Jim Lane and the Chamber of Commerce caucus on the Scottsdale City Council.

Editor’s note: Mr. Washington is a Scottsdale resident and editor of Scottsdaletrails.com

Mr. Washington is a local community advocate and editor of Scottsdaletrails.com

Source:  Scottsdale Independent

Do you like this post?

Showing 2 reactions


commented 2015-10-13 09:06:57 -0600 · Flag
Thank you for posting that John. I am disgusted with the city council! The only member that has held true to his commitment is Guy Phillips! They are so easily bamboozled! I sure do hope we can get David Smith off the council next time around, he is the biggest disappointment of all because the TEA party endorsed him! He sure pulled the wool over our eyes as he was the first to break promises. Kathy is also a big disappointment. their rationale is amazing.
published this page in Scottsdale City Council & DDC 2015-10-13 07:06:44 -0600