Tea Party of Scottsdale, AZ
Our mission is to attract, educate, organize, and mobilize our fellow citizens to secure public policy consistent with our three core values: Personal Freedom, Economic Freedom and a Debt-Free Future



Another Internet Hype - that's wrong

Well, another internet fallacy blithely passed along that only generates more devisiveness.  Response from former U.S. Senator Alan K. Simpson from someone who knows him at  The Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget:
This is a very serious response to the “classmate/volunteer” who posted the most extraordinary and bizarre document called “Alan Simpson and a Look at Obama.” I do not know who this fellow is, and I never 

spent 15 minutes with anyone (as he says: “Just the two of us”) that day – but I sure as hell know who I am and what I said. So hang on tight! 
The first part of the young person’s remarks are quite correct. And all of it is pretty sharp and real in my memory right down to the sentence, “ ….. but in typical Simpson fashion, he wanted to be just another visitor.” Next is where the fabrication and the exaggeration and plain damn lies begin.
First, I don’t remember calling this fellow “Howard this and Howard that in typical politician fashion.” The rest of that paragraph is correct but the rest of it is a serious distortion of what I told anyone – classmate, volunteer, person listening, or anybody else within the range of my remarks.
What I said was this: “We turned in our report on December 1, 2010 and it was not received well by the President or anyone else.  The President thanked us and walked away from it – as did most Republicans and Democrats.”
I often tell people who would ask me, “Why did the President and Congress reject the plan?” And I always respond, as I did to anyone, including “Howard” – “The President knew if he supported our proposal – the Moment of Truth – that he would be blasted by his base who would say to him: You said you would close Guantanamo and you didn’t. You said you would cut the deficit in half and you didn’t. And now you’re talking about doing something with entitlements thus hurting poor seniors and veterans, and you’d better forget that. The Republicans – in the event he would have voted for it – would likely at that time of continual bitterness have caucused together and decided if Obama votes yes, we’ll unanimously vote no.” That was always stated most clearly by me to anyone who has ever inquired over these last months and years.
It was after many months later when the President asked to see Erskine in order to discuss the situation. Erskine then had approximately an hour and 45 minutes with the President. I was not present. And after a candid conversation with no staff present, the President told Erskine that he knew well what our commission had done, that he understood our proposals, agreed with many of them and that he intended to address many of them “after his reelection.”
According to my friend Erskine, the President made no specific recommendations about what he intended to do other than what I have stated above. This “volunteer” is a pure visionary and sure short on the truth. The President never said, “that to accept the recommendations would give the Republicans a victory as seen by the voters and he was not ever going to do that now or ever. He was adamant that he wanted more spending and more taxes and that he would pursue that course throughout his administration until his last day in office.” This is one damn lie.
The next paragraph is a stunner indeed. Bowles never urged him to follow a specific course of action. And Obama’s response had nothing to do with the statement that “he would let the next president worry about the spending and debt, but he was going to spend and tax and redistribute wealth throughout his term.”  The President sure as hell never said it to Bowles or to me or to any American. This is a total fabrication.
And as far as “both men were furious after spending 1.5 hours with the president, they left in utter disbelief.” First, as I stated before, I was never there with the President, so that’s another pretty good slap at veracity. My only “utter disbelief” is about his quote since Bowles never said anything about “thinking that he could have some credibility with the D's in the House and Senate tried to gather some influence with that group and was quickly advised that the Obama agenda would go forward at all costs [sic].”  No such comment was ever made.
Nor was there ever any “desperate attempt to get some traction” and Bowles never thought “if he went to see the president without (me) being there we would have a more meaningful result.” There never was a “second time” to see the President, since there was never a “first time” with me there, as has been clearly reported publicly and again here.
At no time have Bowles or I ever said that the “President is not interested in anything except his political agenda.” And the capper in this desperate distortion is the final quote which has never been uttered from my lips, “Don’t expect anything good for America until this guy is gone.” I never said that, it’s another damn lie. This is our President. I didn’t vote for him – but he appointed me by Executive Order to co-chair the Commission. So “Howard” must have a tremendous bias against me and this president. What I said is; “This President wants a legacy, as all presidents do – and he might succeed in passing legislation on gun control and climate change and immigration, but if he doesn’t get a handle on the growth and cost of healthcare and work to assure solvency to Social Security for 75 years then he will have a failed presidency – and he surely doesn’t want that!” That’s what I said, and what I always say.
It sure burns a guy’s butt when he finds some wandering soul named “Howard” who either doesn’t hear correctly, or chooses to fabricate a conversation to fit his own ego or prejudice. He needs to get back in the classroom and listen ever more closely to the instructors – or his mentors – or all persons he has conversations with. He’ll get a helluva lot further in life that way!
I’ve been in politics a long time and I commend a wonderful poem to all who want to get into this fray because if you are in politics, just know that it is a contact sport. Yes, you sometimes take it right in the chops, and you’ve got to learn to give as good as you get. I do that. I always remember Rudyard Kipling’s powerful poem “If” – and let me quote a few great lines,
“If you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you;
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubting too:
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting,
Or, being lied about, don't deal in lies,
Or being hated don't give way to hating,
And yet don't look too good, nor talk too wise;”
But here’s the best one for the good old “volunteer” at the library:

“If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,”

That seems to say it pretty clearly for me. Take your own pick as to who is telling the truth. I just wanted to state “my side” – always a good thing. And never let anyone in public, private or political life – ever distort who you are or what you say. Onward!

Do you like this post?

Showing 3 reactions

@TPScottsdale tweeted link to this page. 2014-01-26 08:42:39 -0700
posted about this on Facebook 2014-01-26 08:42:38 -0700
"Don't expect anything good for America until this guy is gone". Sen Alan Simpson
published this page in The Lighter Side 2014-01-26 08:42:27 -0700